Description

Evercrest Funding Case I purchased and successfully completed Evercrest Funding's evaluation and received a funded account. After becoming funded, I traded manually using my own strategy. I later made significant profits, after which my account was flagged for review. Evercrest requested a Zoom interview, manual KYC documents, and a Veriff identity verification. I fully cooperated with every request. I attended the Zoom interview, provided my government ID, proof of address, bank statement, and explanations for any transactions they asked about. Evercrest later informed me that I had failed their security checks. They claimed I had used a proxy, had three devices, and multiple IP addresses associated with my account. During a call, they showed me a report indicating three devices and four IP addresses. I strongly dispute these findings. Throughout my trading, I only used: One Windows PC. One Google Pixel phone. My normal home internet and mobile data. I did not intentionally use a VPN, proxy, remote desktop, VPS, or any anti-detection software while trading. I repeatedly asked Evercrest to explain what they considered the third device or which IPs they believed were proxies. They declined to provide sufficient technical details for me to verify or investigate their findings. One reason I question the accuracy of their detection is that shortly after Evercrest's Veriff verification failed, I successfully completed a Veriff identity verification on Trustpilot using the same Google Pixel phone. This does not prove Evercrest's decision was wrong, but it made me question the reliability of the results they relied upon.

Evidence

Case Timeline